The argument that these "zinesters" make is regarding let say music is "How can you have a connection with an artist when you are one of thousands jam packed in a huge stadium?" I can understand this point of view, but at the same time I also know that it is possible to have a connection with an artists even if you are one in a million. The connection is made if you are a good artist. If you have that "it" factor, then you can make that connection. I have been to many different concerts of all different genres and I feel as though a person can decipher if an artist is truly a good artist based on the connection that they feel with them at a live concert. For example, I went to a Fray concert last Fall shortly after (well maybe not shortly but months after) a Bruce Springsteen concert. The difference was that of night and day for I couldn't make any connection at The Fray concert. Although the music sounded great, I felt as thought they were just there to play and that was it. The only thing that I could honestly focus on was the huge array of cell phone "lights" and bad singing by the audience. I know I use Springsteen as an example quite often, but it is all in good reason. I have attended his concerts and the experience is nothing short of a music revival. He has the audience in the palm of his hand and we are willing to be there.
![]() |
| Springsteen and the E-Street Band were always fully involved in the way that they were going to sound to their audience. Here they are working in the studio. |
I want to wrap this up by just stating that there is no reason for a person to blame another for being successful. You can express yourself through a successful magazine just like you would through a zine, but the zinesters in the film seemed to stubborn to negotiate with corporations. Life is all one big compromise for goodness sake! I mean, a lot of their writing is great and unique and it probably should be read by many different people, but it will never get the chance for these writers are too stubborn to compromise with a successful corporation. They need to grow up, and negotiate in order to get their voices heard. Just because you are writing for a successful magazine, doesn't by any way mean that you are losing who you are as a person. If these writers are so good then they should take on that challenge and see if they can write for a successful company without losing thier own identity. That's the challenge that every writer has to deal with and it is only normal. I felt such a sense of immaturity coming from these writers. I felt as though they were complaining and felt a sense of sadness from each person in the film. If they know who they are as a writer and as a person, then they should find no struggle with losing their identity in their writing.




